# What is the St. Petersburg Paradox

## Petersburg paradox

The Petersburg paradox is intended to make it clear that the general application of the Bernoulli criterion as a decision rule can lead to nonsensical consequences. In the Petersburg game, a player tosses a coin until the number falls. The game is over when a number is dropped for the first time on the nth throw. If number falls on the nth roll, then the player is paid 2 "monetary units. If tails already come on the first throw, he receives 2 monetary units, on the second throw he receives 22 monetary units, and so on. The probability that on the first throw The number falls is 1/2. The mathematical expectation of the payoff for the game is infinite. If the Bernoulli criterion were to be applied, participation in this game would have to be preferred to any other alternative course of action with a finite expectation, which is generally not considered to be a sensible behavior.

Constructed game of chance, which is pointed out as an argument against the usefulness of the g, principle as a decision rule for risky situations: An ideal coin is tossed until "number" appears for the first time. If this is the case with the first throw, the player receives 2 DM; If "number" falls in the second throw, he receives double the amount, i.e. 4 DM; If "number" only appears on the third throw, the profit is twice that again, ie 8 DM, etc. The mathematical expected value for the profit that can be achieved in this game is infinitely high. If the —1.1 principle is applied, everyone else would have to take part in this game. Alternative action with finite expected value, e.g. B. a gift of 1000 DM or 1 million DM, which would generally hardly be regarded as sensible behavior.

Constructed game of chance, which is pointed out as an argument against the usefulness of the g, principle as a decision rule for risky situations: An ideal coin is tossed until "number" appears for the first time. If this is the case with the first throw, the player receives 2 DM; If "number" falls in the second throw, he receives double the amount, i.e. 4 DM; If "number" only appears on the third throw, the profit is twice that again, ie 8 DM, etc. The mathematical expected value for the profit that can be achieved in this game is infinitely high. If the —1.1 principle is applied, everyone else would have to take part in this game. Alternative action with finite expected value, e.g. B. a gift of 1000 DM or 1 million DM, which would generally hardly be regarded as sensible behavior.

Previous technical term: Peter principle | Next technical term: Petri net

*Report this article to the editors as incorrect & mark it for editing*- Can someone survive stage 4 liver cancer
- Should I disable cookies in my browser?
- How can I buy cheap hosting
- What do you not know about cars
- What was your first affiliate marketing success
- Is Kuala Lumpur a well organized city
- Let's go to the third world war
- Amazon FBA is for beginners
- What can you do for self-actualization
- The Chinese eat koalas
- Why do royals join the military
- Which foods are mostly bought in supermarkets
- Can I be more important than IQ
- How do you sharpen an ax
- Is hunting illegal in the US?
- Bill Gates really helps poor people
- What are some life hacks in general
- Why is the Grand Canyon famous
- Can you sue someone for property damage?
- Enjoy reading romance novels
- A gram is different from a kilometer
- How does GDP growth affect exchange rates
- Why is junk food not healthy?
- Is Trump doing well as President?