Why is the salary a secret
Labor law column: Is it forbidden to talk about salary?
Can I talk to my colleagues about my salary or can my employer forbid me to do so? Asks Thomas Hell.
Dear Mr. Hell,
As an employee, you are initially subject to a general duty of confidentiality and confidentiality, which can also be extended in your employment contract. This means that you are not allowed to pass on any trade or business secrets to third parties. If you do not adhere to this, your employer can insist on an omission and, in the event of specific damage, also claim damages. You must also expect personal consequences such as a warning or even termination without notice.
Wage and salary information can also be affected by this general duty of confidentiality - but only if the salary data is relevant to competition. This is the case when competitors gain a competitive advantage from this information. This is how the judges of the Federal Labor Court ruled in principle (Az .: 6 ABR 46/84).
The boss is amazed
"The boss is amazed"
What is allowed, what is not? The Berlin labor lawyer Ulf Weigelt provides answers to user questions. Every week, every Wednesday, in the labor law column "Da is amazed the boss".
Write to us (please include your name and place of residence). We are happy and choose one question every week from all the problems we are asked and answer it here.
You can read all the episodes here.
Disclaimer of liability
Please note: The author assumes no liability for the topicality, correctness, completeness or quality of the answers and information provided, as well as the case law. Liability claims against the author relating to material or immaterial damage caused by the use or non-use of the information provided or by the use of incorrect or incomplete information are fundamentally excluded. All texts on this website are protected by copyright. The author within the meaning of the law on copyright and related rights (UrhG) is lawyer and specialist lawyer for labor law Ulf Weigelt, Choriner Straße 63, 10435 Berlin. Literal or analogous quotations are only legally permissible with the prior written consent of the author or with an explicit reference to the third-party authorship (reference in terms of § 63 UrhG). Violations will be prosecuted.
BUY AS E-BOOK
The answers from specialist lawyer Ulf Weigelt are also available to you in a clearly arranged form as e-books. Once downloaded, you can look up the labor law issues it contains on your electronic reader anytime, anywhere.
You can find an overview of our e-books here: www.zeit.de/ebooks.
You can find all of Ulf Weigelt's books here.
Specifically, this case was about the fact that the employer wanted to prohibit its works council and individual works council members from publishing wage and salary data. As an employee representative, the works council has access to wage and salary data. And in this specific case, this data was also part of the business calculation of sales and profit opportunities. Thus, the payrolls were also regarded as trade secrets that competitors in the industry should of course not learn.
As a rule, normal employees are allowed to compare their salaries with colleagues
However, this by no means means that every employee must keep quiet about his or her salary. Whether you are obliged to maintain confidentiality vis-à-vis your colleagues depends on the one hand on whether this affects your competitiveness. Your employer would then have to prove that. On the other hand, it would have to be checked whether an extension of the general confidentiality by a so-called confidentiality clause was effectively agreed. Such a clause can also extend to information regarding the individual employment relationship between employer and employee and sometimes extend to the agreed salary.
However, both prerequisites only occur extremely rarely and especially among employees in high management positions. Because it is very difficult for the employer to effectively enforce such clauses. Because if employment contracts contain such a confidentiality clause, they are very often ineffective. Finally, employees must not be unreasonably disadvantaged on the basis of Section 307 (1) BGB. However, this is usually the case when employees are forced to maintain such secrecy. Because if they are forbidden to talk to colleagues about their salary, they cannot find out whether the company complies with the principle of equal treatment under labor law or not.
At the same time, such a duty of confidentiality also violates the Basic Law - namely Article 9 (3) of the Basic Law. At least that's how the judges of the Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania Regional Labor Court see it (Az .: 2 Sa 237/09). They considered a clause to be ineffective, according to which the employee was obliged to treat the amount of the remuneration confidentially and to maintain silence about it towards other company employees. However, the employee had compared his salary with a colleague - and promptly received a warning from the boss. Wrongly so, so the state labor judges. The warning had to be removed from the personnel file because the entire contractual clause was ineffective.
Yours Ulf Weigelt
- Why is Queen Elizabeth in Australian currency
- How does the date of the postmark work
- What does the Bible say about pedophilia
- What is the deadliest knife
- How much does a slave cost today
- Are social connections important on social media
- Are you a smart person
- Do I need an account for Quora?
- What is your favorite tv show couple
- How should I pronounce salmon correctly
- Is logistic regression only for binary classification
- What are the capitalist countries in Asia
- What's your take on hypergamy?
- Is Quora for children
- What is the unspoken rule that everyone should know
- What is a work card
- How do Americans see the Chinese
- Does the wormhole theory really exist?
- The black hole also attracts light
- What happens when I cook aluminum
- Why do you love samsung
- What is the main component in CNG
- How much money does Quora earn each month
- Shows creativity a high IQ